Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid on delayed deposit of employees' contribution to provident fund is allowable as a deduction under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The issue was examined in the light of the statutory scheme governing employees' contributions, including section 2(24)(x), section 36(1)(va) and Explanation 1 to section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The relevant legal position was taken from the distinction between employer's contribution and employees' contribution, as settled by the Supreme Court in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. The employees' share is treated as income in the hands of the employer and is required to be deposited within the prescribed due date. If the principal amount itself is not deductible because of statutory prohibition, interest arising from delayed payment partakes the same character as the principal. Since section 37(1) is a residual provision and cannot be used to claim expenditure prohibited by law, deduction of such interest was held to be impermissible.
Conclusion: The interest on delayed deposit of employees' contribution to provident fund is not deductible under section 37(1) and the disallowance was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the underlying employees' contribution is statutorily required to be deposited within the due date and is otherwise not deductible beyond that limit, interest attributable to the delayed remittance is of the same character and cannot be claimed as a deduction under the residuary business expenditure provision.