Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Start-up loses section 80IAC deduction for failing to file mandatory Form 10CCB within prescribed time</h1> The ITAT Delhi upheld CIT(A)'s decision denying deduction under section 80IAC for failure to file Form 10CCB within the prescribed time. The tribunal held ... Denial of deduction u/s. 80IAC - Form 10CCB is not filed or not filed within the due date - HELD THAT:- It is incorrect to say that the Form No. 10CCB does not require to furnish as per section 80IAC as prescribed under Rule 18BBB of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. Ld. CIT(A) is correct in holding that from the above provisions, it is seen by virtue of provision of sub-section (4) of Section 80IAC, the provisions of sub-section (7) of section 80IA have been made applicable to the start-ups for claiming deduction under section 80IAC of the Act although the word start-ups has not been used in said sub-section. Rule 18BBB of the Rules prescribing the Form 10CCB has also become applicable to the start-ups and then for a claim u/s. 80IAC it is essential report in Form 10CCB is duly furnished. CIT(A) has passed a reasonable order - ground raised by the assessee stands rejected. The core legal questions considered in this judgment revolve around the eligibility and procedural compliance for claiming deduction under section 80IAC of the Income-tax Act, specifically:Whether the assessee is required to furnish an audit report in Form No. 10CCB to claim deduction under section 80IAC of the Act;The applicability of the provisions of section 80IA, particularly sub-section (7), to start-ups claiming deduction under section 80IAC;The legal validity of disallowing the deduction claimed under section 80IAC on the ground of non-filing or late filing of Form 10CCB;The interpretation of the statutory provisions and rules governing the audit report requirement and its procedural timeline;The relevance and applicability of precedents cited by the assessee regarding the timing and necessity of filing Form 10CCB.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis1. Requirement of Filing Form No. 10CCB for Claiming Deduction under Section 80IACThe legal framework central to this issue is section 80IAC of the Income-tax Act, which provides deduction for profits and gains derived from eligible start-ups. Sub-section (4) of section 80IAC explicitly incorporates the provisions of sub-section (5) and sub-sections (7) to (11) of section 80IA to start-ups for the purpose of claiming deductions under sub-section (1) of section 80IAC. Section 80IA(7) mandates that the deduction is admissible only if the accounts of the undertaking have been audited by an accountant within the prescribed time and the audit report is furnished in the prescribed form.The prescribed form under Rule 18BBB of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, is Form No. 10CCB. The Court emphasized that although section 80IAC does not explicitly mention the requirement of filing Form 10CCB, the cross-reference to section 80IA(7) imports this requirement to start-ups claiming deduction under section 80IAC. Therefore, the furnishing of Form 10CCB is mandatory.The Court rejected the assessee's contention that Form 10CCB is not mandated under section 80IAC and that the form itself does not mention section 80IAC. It held that the statutory provisions must be read conjunctively, and the absence of explicit mention in the form does not exempt the assessee from compliance.2. Validity of Disallowance of Deduction on Ground of Non-filing of Form 10CCBThe CPC, Bangalore, disallowed the deduction claimed under section 80IAC by making adjustments under section 143(1)(a)(ii) of the Act on the ground that Form 10CCB was not filed or not filed within the due date. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, reasoning that the audit report is crucial for verifying the fulfillment of the conditions prescribed under section 80IA, which are applicable to section 80IAC claims.The Court noted that the processing of returns under section 143(1) is a technology-driven, automated process that relies on the entries and documents furnished by the assessee. The absence of Form 10CCB prevents the system from ascertaining compliance with necessary conditions, justifying the adjustment.It was further observed that the assessee did not produce any evidence to demonstrate that the online facility prevented filing of Form 10CCB or that the form was furnished subsequently before assessment completion. The Court distinguished precedents relied upon by the assessee where Form 10CCB was filed belatedly but before assessment completion, which is not the case here.3. Interpretation of Procedural Timelines and Conditions under Sections 80IAC and 80IASection 80IA(7) requires the audit to be completed and the report furnished before the specified date referred to in section 44AB, which is one month prior to the due date for filing the return under section 139(1). The Court reiterated that this timeline is mandatory and non-compliance results in forfeiture of deduction entitlement.The Court dismissed the argument that the absence of a dedicated column in Form 10CCB for section 80IAC deduction exempts the assessee from filing the form. It emphasized that the form must be filled to the extent applicable and submitted online as per statutory mandate.4. Treatment of Competing Arguments and PrecedentsThe assessee argued that section 80IAC does not explicitly require filing Form 10CCB and relied on precedents where delayed filing of the form was accepted. The Court rejected these arguments, holding that the provisions of section 80IAC must be read with section 80IA, which explicitly mandates the audit report. The precedents were distinguished on facts, as in those cases Form 10CCB was eventually filed before assessment, unlike in the present matter.5. Application of Law to Facts and Final ConclusionsGiven the undisputed fact that Form 10CCB was not filed at all by the assessee, the Court found the disallowance of the deduction under section 80IAC to be legally sound and procedurally justified. The failure to furnish the audit report within the prescribed timeline disentitles the assessee from claiming the deduction.Significant Holdings'The provisions of sub-section (4) of section 80IAC provide that the provisions of sub-section (5) and sub-sections (7) to (11) of section 80IA shall apply to the start-ups for the purpose of allowing deductions under sub-section (1).''The deduction under sub-section (1) from profits and gains derived from an undertaking shall not be admissible unless the accounts of the undertaking for the previous year relevant to the assessment for which the deduction is claimed have been audited by an accountant... and the assessee furnishes by that date the report of such audit in the prescribed form duly signed and verified by such accountant.''The form for the audit report required to be furnished as per section 80IA(7) has been prescribed under Rule 18BBB of the Rules which is Form No. 10CCB.''It is incorrect to say that the furnishing of Form 10CCB has not been prescribed under section 80IAC read with section 80IA of the Act and Rule 18BBB of the Rules.''The adjustments made at the time of processing of return are prima-facie adjustments required to be made on the face of the return... the filing of audit report within specified time frame is mandatory to avoid any such adjustment.''The case laws relied upon by the appellant are distinguishable as the facts of those cases are different from the facts of the present case.''In view of the discussion above, the disallowance of deduction of Rs. 20,27,56,020/- claimed under section 80IAC for the failure of the appellant to furnish the Form No. 10CCB is hereby confirmed.'The Court affirmed the order of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal, confirming that the failure to furnish the audit report in Form 10CCB within the prescribed time frame disentitles the assessee from claiming deduction under section 80IAC. The ruling establishes that the procedural compliance under section 80IA(7) and Rule 18BBB is mandatory for start-ups claiming deduction under section 80IAC, and non-compliance results in automatic disallowance at the return processing stage.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found