Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revision petitions entertained against an order of rectification under the Odisha Value Added Tax Act, 2004 were maintainable and whether the resulting orders were liable to be quashed for want of jurisdiction.
Analysis: The assessment for the relevant tax period had been framed under Section 42 of the Odisha Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The petitioner sought rectification under Section 81, and the grievance against the rectification order was carried in revision under Section 79(2) before the Additional Commissioner and thereafter before the Commissioner. On the admitted position that the rectification order related back to the assessment order, the revisional authorities were found to have no jurisdiction to entertain the revisions against such an order. Orders passed without statutory authority were treated as ineffective and without legal force.
Conclusion: The revision orders were held to be without jurisdiction and were quashed. The petitioner was permitted to pursue the appropriate alternative remedy available under the Odisha Value Added Tax Act, 2004.