Drawback and double-benefit challenge fails where supplier's duty-free input procurement does not defeat merchant exporter's claim.

A merchant exporter's drawback claim was held not to amount to an impermissible double benefit merely because the supplier had manufactured the exported goods using inputs procured without central excise duty under Rule 19(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Applying the earlier ruling on the same export product and drawback dispute, the Court found the recovery demand, penalty orders, and adjudication orders unsustainable. The show cause notices also could not survive, particularly in view of the long delay between issuance and adjudication. The petitions were therefore allowed and the impugned demands and notices quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the demand of drawback, penalties, and the impugned adjudication orders could be sustained where the exported goods were purchased from suppliers who had manufactured the goods by availing the benefit of Rule 19(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and whether the show cause notices and orders-in-original were liable to be quashed.

Analysis: The petitions were examined in the light of the earlier decision on the same export product and the same drawback controversy. The governing principle applied was that the drawback claimed by the merchant exporter related only to the customs portion of the export incentive, and the mere fact that the supplier had procured hexane without payment of central excise duty under Rule 19(2) did not establish that the exporter had obtained an impermissible double benefit. The reasoning in the earlier decision was treated as fully applicable, and the impugned recovery and penalty orders were found unsustainable. The Court also noted the long delay between issuance of the show cause notices and their adjudication, which reinforced the conclusion that the notices could not survive after the merits were decided.

Conclusion: The demand of drawback, the penalty orders, and the underlying show cause notices were quashed, and the petitions were allowed in favour of the assessees.

---