Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on capital goods was admissible when the plant was not exclusively used for manufacture of exempted goods and the exempted product emerged only as a by-product.
Analysis: The plant was found to be integral to the manufacture of iron and steel products, since it removed hazardous chemicals and gases from coke oven gas before that gas could be used in the final manufacturing process. The Tribunal held that the plant was not exclusively meant for manufacturing ammonium sulphate and that ammonium sulphate was only separated out as a by-product. The Tribunal also relied on the earlier coordinate bench view that credit is admissible where the machinery is not exclusively used for exempted goods.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the capital goods was admissible and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The order allowing credit was upheld and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Credit on capital goods is allowable where the machinery is not exclusively used for exempted goods and is instead part of an integrated manufacturing process, even if an exempted product emerges incidentally as a by-product.