Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>SC confirms DRP's authority ends after assessment order under Section 144C(5); no directions post-assessment order</h1> The SC upheld the HC's decision that the dispute resolution panel (DRP) has authority to issue directions only during pending assessment proceedings under ... Validity of order passed u/s 144C(5) - Reference to dispute resolution panel - [2023 (9) TMI 759 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] - as decided by HC [2023 (9) TMI 759 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] DRP could give directions only in pending assessment proceedings. Once assessment order is passed, rightly or wrongly, the assessment proceedings come to an end. Therefore, the DRP would have no power to pass any directions contemplated under subsection 5 of Section 144C of the Act. Thus quash and set aside the directions issued by DRP and the consequent assessment order. HELD THAT:- After having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, we find no error in the view taken by the High Court. Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The Supreme Court, with Hon'ble Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan presiding, after hearing counsel for the petitioner, 'found no error in the view taken by the High Court.' The Court 'condoned delay' and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. The pending application was disposed of accordingly.