Income Tax Reassessment Notice Struck Down: Procedural Violations Invalidate Section 148A(d) Assessment Beyond Limitation Period

SC invalidated the income tax reassessment notice due to procedural non-compliance. The court found the notice was issued beyond the prescribed limitation period after considering exclusions mandated by judicial precedents. The Assessing Officer's order under Section 148A(d) was deemed invalid as it exceeded the permitted timeline, rendering the entire reassessment process null and void.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered by the Court were:

• Whether the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2014-15 was validly issued within the prescribed period of limitation;
• Whether the initial notice issued on 23.06.2021, which was issued prior to the Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India & Others v. Ashish Agarwal, complied with the amended procedural requirements under Section 148A of the Act;
• Whether the period between issuance of the initial notice and the Supreme Court's decision, as well as the time allowed for the Assessee to respond to the notice under Section 148A(b), ought to be excluded from the limitation period under Section 149(1) of the Act;
• Whether the subsequent order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 148A(d) on 11.07.2022 was issued within the extended limitation period;
• Whether the extension of limitation period under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) applied to the issuance of the notice in this case;
• Whether the impugned notice issued on 11.07.2022 was beyond the prescribed limitation period and therefore liable to be quashed.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Validity and Limitation Period for Notice under Section 148

The relevant legal framework governing the issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is Sections 148, 148A, and 149 of the Act, alongside the amendments introduced by TOLA and judicial precedents.

Before 31.03.2021, notices under Section 148 could be issued based on the then-prevailing procedural regime. However, post 31.03.2021, the procedure was amended by insertion of Section 148A, which mandates the AO to provide material and information justifying the issuance of the notice and to allow the Assessee an opportunity to respond before proceeding.

In Mon Mohan Kohli v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, the Delhi High Court invalidated notices issued after 31.03.2021 that did not comply with Section 148A. Subsequently, the Supreme Court in Union of India & Others v. Ashish Agarwal clarified that such notices would be treated as issued under Section 148A(b), and directed the AO to supply the material on which the notice was based, granting the Assessee time to respond.

In the present case, the initial notice under Section 148 was issued on 23.06.2021, within the extended limitation period granted by TOLA, which extended the six-year period to 30.06.2021. However, this notice was issued before the Supreme Court's ruling in Ashish Agarwal and thus did not comply with Section 148A procedural requirements.

Exclusion of Time Under Section 149(1) of the Act

The Court examined the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India & Others v. Ashish Agarwal and the subsequent ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal, which clarified that the period from issuance of the initial notice till the Supreme Court's decision (04.05.2022) must be excluded from the limitation period calculation. Furthermore, the time allowed to the Assessee to respond to the notice under Section 148A(b) is also excluded pursuant to the Third Proviso to Section 149(1).

Thus, the limitation period for issuing a valid notice was effectively extended beyond the original expiry date, accounting for the exclusion of the period during which the Assessee was entitled to respond.

Issuance of the Order under Section 148A(d) on 11.07.2022

The AO issued an order under Section 148A(d) on 11.07.2022, which the Assessee contended was beyond the permissible period. The Court analyzed the timeline and noted that the AO had seven days from the receipt of the Assessee's reply to issue the notice. Since the Assessee did not file any reply to the notice dated 26.05.2022, the seven-day period expired on 18.06.2022.

Accordingly, issuance of the order on 11.07.2022 was beyond the prescribed period, rendering the notice invalid on grounds of limitation.

Application of TOLA Extension

The Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 extended the limitation period for issuance of notices under Section 148 to 30.06.2021. The initial notice dated 23.06.2021 was issued within this extended period, thereby satisfying the temporal requirement for issuance of the original notice.

However, due to the subsequent procedural requirements under Section 148A and the Supreme Court's rulings, the limitation period calculation had to factor in exclusions, which ultimately rendered the impugned notice beyond limitation.

Treatment of Competing Arguments

The Respondents contended that the notice was valid as it was issued within the extended limitation period and complied with the Supreme Court's directions. The Assessee argued that the impugned notice was issued beyond the extended and excluded limitation period and was thus invalid.

The Court relied on the binding precedents of the Supreme Court and this Court's prior ruling in Ram Balram Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer, which supported the Assessee's contention that the notice issued post expiry of the exclusion period was invalid.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

The Court held:

"The period from the date of issuance of the notice till 04.05.2022, the date on which the Supreme Court rendered its decision in Union of India & Ors. v. Ashish Agarwal, is required to be excluded from limitation."

"The time provided until the material required to accompany the notice under section 148A (b) of the Act, as well as the time available to the Assessee to respond to the said notice, is also required to be excluded by virtue of the Third Proviso to Section 149 (1) of the Act."

"The AO had seven days to issue the notice under Section 148 of the Act after receipt of the reply of the Assessee. The said period expired on 18.06.2022. However, the impugned notice was issued on 11.07.2022, which is beyond the prescribed period.

---