TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules in favor of petitioner society in tax exemption challenge, emphasizing income utilization for charity</h1> <h3>Haryana State Counselling Society Versus Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Panchkula</h3> Haryana State Counselling Society Versus Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Panchkula - tmi Issues:Challenge to rejection of exemption under Section 10(23C) (iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Panchkula.Analysis:1. The petitioner, a society set up by the Government of Haryana to streamline admission procedures for Technical Institutes, sought exemption under Section 10(23C) (iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Chief Commissioner, Income Tax, Panchkula, rejected the application citing commercial activities.2. The Chief Commissioner highlighted the restriction on charitable purposes involving trade, commerce, or business activities. The petitioner society earned significant income from registration fees, counseling fees, and bank interest, leading to a surplus. The Chief Commissioner questioned the charitable nature of the society's activities due to the profit motive and commercial resemblance.3. The court considered the nature of the petitioner society's activities, emphasizing its role in facilitating admissions and providing scholarships to students. Referring to precedents, the court stressed that the utilization of income for charitable purposes is crucial, not just the source of income. The court noted that the mere accumulation of profit does not disqualify an entity from claiming exemption.4. Relying on previous judgments, the court emphasized that the utilization of income for charitable objectives is paramount. The court found that the petitioner society, being government-initiated and engaging in non-commercial activities, remained eligible for exemption despite accumulating profit. The court set aside the Chief Commissioner's order and directed a reevaluation of the petitioner's application within three months.5. The judgment underscores the importance of assessing the actual utilization of income for charitable purposes rather than solely focusing on profit accumulation. It upholds the eligibility of government-backed entities engaging in non-commercial activities for tax exemptions under relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 