Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether GST proceedings and the impugned assessment order could be sustained when the proprietor of the proprietorship firm had died before the proceedings were taken out, and whether the petitioner was entitled to be heard before any tax liability was fastened on him as legal heir.
Analysis: The proceedings were initiated against the proprietorship firm after the death of its sole proprietor, who had been exclusively in charge of the business. The assessment was therefore made against a dead person and could not be sustained. Since the petitioner was the legal heir and had not been noticed by the revenue at any stage, he was entitled to an opportunity of hearing before any liability could be imposed. The matter was covered by the earlier binding decision of the Court on the same principle.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the assessing authority for fresh proceedings after notice to the petitioner in accordance with law.