Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential reassessment proceedings for the assessment year 2017-18 could be sustained in view of the approved resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the clean slate principle.
Analysis: The Petitioner had undergone a corporate insolvency resolution process and a resolution plan had been approved by the National Company Law Tribunal. The challenge to reopening of completed tax liabilities was covered by earlier decisions holding that claims not provided for in the approved resolution plan cannot be pursued against the corporate debtor. In view of that settled position, the impugned reopening and all consequential proceedings lacked legal foundation.
Conclusion: The impugned order under Section 148A(d) and all further proceedings for assessment year 2017-18 were set aside in favour of the Petitioner.