Court dismisses delay condonation applications under Limitation Act; appeals time-barred due to specific Income-tax Act provisions.

The court dismissed the applications seeking condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. It held that specific provisions for condonation of delay in the Income-tax Act excluded the applicability of the Limitation Act. The court emphasized that in the absence of explicit provisions for condonation of delay, applications under the Limitation Act could not be entertained, similar to the interpretation applied in a previous Supreme Court case related to the Central Excise Act.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether delay in filing the appeal beyond the prescribed period could be condoned by entertaining an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963Rs.

Analysis:

1. The judgment addressed the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court considered the appeals challenging a common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which dismissed the appeals filed by various cooperative societies on the ground of being time-barred. The main question for determination was whether delay beyond the prescribed period could be condoned by invoking section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

2. The appeals involved applications invoking section 5 of the Limitation Act, seeking condonation of a 74-day delay in filing the appeals. The court referred to a judgment by the Supreme Court in a case related to the Central Excise Act, emphasizing that where a special law provides for limitation, the provisions of the Limitation Act may not apply. The court examined the language of relevant sections in the Excise Act to conclude that the Limitation Act was excluded.

3. The court further analyzed the provisions of the Income-tax Act, noting that specific provisions for condonation of delay were included in certain sections. Drawing parallels with the Excise Act, the court held that if the Act does not provide for condonation of delay, applications under section 5 of the Limitation Act cannot be accepted. The court relied on the Supreme Court's reasoning in a previous case to support this conclusion.

4. Consequently, the court dismissed the applications seeking condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. The judgment emphasized that the Act, like the Excise Act, is considered a complete code, and in the absence of specific provisions for condonation of delay, applications under the Limitation Act cannot be entertained.

---