Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty notice under section 274 read with section 271 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was defective for not specifying the exact limb of section 271(1)(c), and whether such defect vitiated the penalty proceedings.
Analysis: The notice was issued in a pre-printed, omnibus format and the irrelevant portions were not struck off. It did not clearly indicate whether the proposed penalty was for concealment of particulars of income, furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, or both. The assessment order also failed to record a clear satisfaction on the specific charge. In such circumstances, the notice and the resulting penalty proceedings were held to be invalid.
Conclusion: The penalty notice was held to be defective and the penalty proceedings were vitiated. The penalty was deleted and the assessee succeeded.