Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court could entertain the statutory appeal under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when the challenged order related to valuation of goods for assessment.
Analysis: Section 35G(1) excludes appeals to the High Court from orders of the Appellate Tribunal that relate, inter alia, to the determination of any question having a relation to the rate of duty of excise or to the value of goods for the purposes of assessment. Since the dispute raised in the appeal concerned valuation, the matter fell within the statutory exclusion from the High Court's appellate jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Final Conclusion: The statutory appeal was not maintainable before the High Court on the question raised and the parties were left to pursue such remedy as may be available in law.
Ratio Decidendi: An appeal under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not lie to the High Court where the order under challenge relates to valuation of goods for assessment.