Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transaction evidenced by the instrument dated 24 February 1939 was a mortgage by conditional sale or a sale with a condition for repurchase, and whether the assessee was entitled to deduct the balance as a bad debt.
Analysis: The governing test under section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act is the real character of the transaction as gathered from the document and surrounding circumstances, with special weight given where an ostensible sale and a condition for repurchase are embodied in one instrument. The deed described the transfer as an absolute sale, but it also contained a lengthy repurchase condition, preserved the condition against transferees, referred to additional surety, and declared the remaining mortgaged property free from mortgage. The transaction followed earlier mortgage transactions and an outstanding debt, and the surrounding features outweighed the indicia of a simple sale.
Conclusion: The transaction was a mortgage by conditional sale. A debt remained outstanding after the 1939 instrument, and the assessee was entitled to treat the balance as a bad debt deductible under section 10(2)(xi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a single document embodies an ostensible sale and a condition for repurchase, the transaction is presumed to be a mortgage by conditional sale unless the document and surrounding circumstances clearly show a contrary intention.