Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment proceedings were correctly initiated under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 despite the petitioner's prior reversal and payment of input tax credit, and whether interim protection against the impugned penalty demand was warranted.
Analysis: The jurisdictional basis of proceeding under Section 74 was questioned with reference to the prior deposit made before the audit process and the asserted entitlement to the benefit of waiver provisions under Section 128A. The order also noticed the request for time to file a counter-affidavit and considered the matter fit for further examination.
Outcome: The petition was directed to be listed on a later date, counter-affidavit was called for, and as an interim measure the petitioner was permitted to deposit the interest component within four weeks, upon which recovery of the penalty demand would remain stayed till the next date.