TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Special leave petition dismissed; notices in petitioner's name valid despite referencing non-existent company; Sections 148 and 148A upheld</h1> <h3>M/s NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.</h3> SC dismissed the special leave petition, upholding the HC's order that notices issued in the petitioner's name cannot be invalidated merely because they ... Reopening of assessment against non non-existent company - Validity of notices issued under the unamended Section 148 post-01.04.2021 - Scope of new provision section 148A - As decided by HC [2025 (1) TMI 820 - DELHI HIGH COURT] notice is in the name of the petitioner and, therefore, cannot be faulted on account of the impugned notice having been issued in the name of a non-existent company. HELD THAT:- Having heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and having gone through the materials on record, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The Supreme Court, through Hon'ble Justices J. B. Pardiwala and K. V. Viswanathan, allowed the exemption application and, after hearing senior counsel and reviewing the record, found 'no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.' Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
