Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether long-term capital gains protected by Article 13(4) of the India-Mauritius DTAA could be reduced by setting off capital losses arising from non-grandfathered share transactions, and whether such losses were liable to be carried forward.
Analysis: The assessee's gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 were treated as exempt under Article 13(4) of the India-Mauritius DTAA and, by virtue of section 90(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the treaty benefit could not be curtailed by bringing such exempt gains into the computation of taxable income for set-off purposes. The Tribunal held that set-off of loss under sections 70 and 74 presupposes the existence of taxable income under the head "Capital Gains", and exempt treaty-protected gains do not constitute income available for such adjustment. It followed earlier coordinate bench rulings that exempt capital gains cannot be offset by losses from other transactions, while the losses themselves remain eligible for carry forward under the Act.
Conclusion: The set-off made in the intimation was unsustainable, the assessee was entitled to full treaty exemption on the grandfathered gains, and the capital losses were to be carried forward to subsequent years.