TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Development Rights Dispute: GST Challenge Halted, Revenue-Sharing Arrangement Questioned Under Section 54 of CGST Act</h1> <h3>Nirmal Lifestyle Developers Pvt. Ltd., Versus The Union of India & Others</h3> Nirmal Lifestyle Developers Pvt. Ltd., Versus The Union of India & Others - TMI In the Bombay High Court case, the petitioner sought a declaration that development rights under a revenue-sharing arrangement do not constitute a 'supply' of services subject to GST under the CGST Act. The petitioner argued that these rights should be considered a 'sale of land,' which falls outside the GST taxation scheme per Articles 246 and 246A of the Constitution and relevant sections of the CGST Act. The petitioner also sought to quash an Order-in-Original dated January 2, 2025.The court considered whether the revenue-sharing arrangement with L & T Asian Realty Project LLP constituted a supply of service exigible to GST. The court noted that while the issue is similar to a case before the Gujarat High Court-where the assignment of a lease was deemed a transfer of immovable property and not taxable under GST-the current case involves no transfer, or if any, a transfer of immovable property, thus not taxable under GST. Consequently, the court found a prima facie case for interim relief.The court granted interim relief, restraining the respondents from acting on the contested Order-in-Original pending the petition's final resolution. Respondents were directed to file an Affidavit in Reply within two weeks, with the petitioner allowed to file a Rejoinder thereafter. The order will be digitally signed and can be acted upon via fax or email.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
