Section 74 CGST orders need reasoned findings on fraud or suppression; unreasoned invocation was quashed and remanded.

An order under Section 74 of the CGST Act must record reasons on the jurisdictional ingredients of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of material facts before that provision can be invoked. Where the adjudicating authority declines to examine those foundational elements and passes an order without a reasoned determination, the order reflects non-application of mind and is unsustainable. The impugned order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for reconsideration after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing and issuing a fresh reasoned order within the stipulated time.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order passed under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was liable to be quashed for non-application of mind and for not recording reasons showing the requisite elements of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of material facts, and whether the matter required reconsideration after hearing the petitioner.

Analysis: The order did not deal with the foundational requirement for invoking Section 74, namely the existence of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of material facts. The authority declined to examine that aspect at the adjudication stage, which showed a complete lack of reasons on a jurisdictional ingredient of the provision. The absence of a reasoned determination on this essential issue amounted to non-application of mind and justified interference.

Conclusion: The impugned order was not sustainable and was quashed. The petitioner was to be given an opportunity of hearing, and a fresh reasoned order was directed to be passed within the stipulated time.

---