Proportional VAT penalty relief: delayed tax deposit with interest justified reduction, not maximum penalty, on bona fide facts.

Delayed remittance of deducted tax under the U.P. VAT Act, accompanied by interest payment and explained by administrative processing, was treated as a case for proportional reduction rather than maximum penalty. The HC noted that the earlier authorities had not adequately considered the explanation and that an identical fact pattern had already justified relief. Applying the discretionary nature of the penalty provision and the surrounding facts, the penalty under Section 34(8) was scaled down from the restored level to one-fourth of the amount already deposited, giving the assessee partial relief.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty under Section 34(8) of the U.P. VAT Act, 2008 was justified for delayed deposit of deducted tax and whether the quantum of penalty required reduction in the facts of the case.

Analysis: The delayed deposit was accompanied by payment of interest, and the surrounding circumstances showed that the delay arose in the course of governmental processing and was not treated as warranting the maximum penalty. The earlier authorities had not given due weight to the explanation offered, while an identical fact situation had already led to reduction of penalty. In view of the peculiar facts and the discretionary character of the penalty provision, the penalty was found liable to be scaled down.

Conclusion: The penalty was not sustained at the restored level of 200% and was confined to 1/4th of the amount, which had already been deposited; the issue was answered in favour of the assessee to that extent.

Final Conclusion: The revisions were allowed only to the extent of modifying the penalty order, and the substantive relief granted was reduction of the penalty burden in line with the assessee's explanation and the precedent relied upon.

Ratio Decidendi: Where delayed remittance is explained by bona fide administrative and interest is paid, a discretionary penalty under the VAT law may be reduced on proportionality grounds rather than sustained at the maximum level.

---