Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether show cause and recovery proceedings initiated against a deceased taxpayer, without issuing notice and affording hearing to his legal heirs, were sustainable under the Jammu and Kashmir Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The demand arose from scrutiny of returns for the financial year 2017-18 and was pursued through notices issued after the taxpayer had already died. Since the initial statutory notice under Section 74 of the Jammu and Kashmir Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the subsequent notices were addressed to a dead person, the legal heirs were never given an opportunity to respond before the demand was confirmed and recovery was initiated. Although Section 93 of the Jammu and Kashmir Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 permits recovery from legal representatives, that provision does not dispense with notice and hearing to them before fastening liability.
Conclusion: The proceedings were unsustainable for want of compliance with the principles of natural justice, and the impugned notices and recovery action were liable to be quashed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, while leaving the respondents free to initiate fresh proceedings from the scrutiny stage after due notice and hearing to the legal heirs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxpayer dies before initiation or continuation of GST proceedings, the department must proceed against the legal heirs with proper notice and hearing before confirming liability or commencing recovery.