Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the loss declared in the return could be reduced in the final assessment on the basis of an unserved intimation under section 143(1) after notice under section 143(2) had been issued, and whether the resultant assessment had to follow the returned loss.
Analysis: The intimation under section 143(1) was not served on the assessee despite repeated requests and grievance petitions, and it was communicated only much later. The assessment proceedings had already moved forward with issue of notice under section 143(2), after which an intimation under section 143(1) could not validly be acted upon. On that basis, the adjustment made through the unserved intimation was treated as invalid, and the final assessment could not rest on a non-existing 143(1) intimation. The challenge relating to non-adjudication of the TDS ground was not examined on merits because it did not arise from the final assessment order.
Conclusion: The reduction of loss based on the unserved intimation was set aside, and the final assessment was directed to follow the returned loss. The assessee succeeded on the main grounds.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the substantive assessment dispute concerning the loss computation, while the separate TDS ground was left unadjudicated, resulting in a partly allowed appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: A final assessment cannot validly rely on an unserved and ineffective intimation under section 143(1) once regular assessment proceedings have progressed under section 143(2).