Goods lost in transit not subject to GST but Input Tax Credit must be reversed under section 17(5)(h)

AAR Gujarat ruled that no GST is payable on goods lost in transit as there is no supply when loss occurs before delivery to customer, prior to place and time of supply. However, the applicant must reverse Input Tax Credit (ITC) on inputs used in manufacturing the lost goods under section 17(5)(h) of CGST Act, 2017. The court held that since lost goods cannot participate in taxable outward supply, the ITC fails vesting conditions under section 16, making it blocked credit that must be reversed.

---

---

ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered in the judgment are:

(i) Whether GST is payable on goods lost in transit.

(ii) If GST is payable, what should be the value of supply for the purpose of payment of GST.

(iii) If GST is not payable, whether the applicant is required to reverse the Input Tax Credit (ITC) in terms of section 17 (5) (h) of the CGST Act, 2017.

(iv) If the applicant is required to reverse ITC in terms of section 17 (5) (h) of the CGST Act, on what basis should the applicant be required to reverse.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue (i): Whether GST is payable on goods lost in transit

Relevant legal framework and precedents:

The relevant provisions include Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, which defines "supply" as including all forms of supply of goods or services made for a consideration in the course of business. Furthermore, Section 10 of the IGST Act, 2017, determines the place of supply as the location where the movement of goods terminates.

Court's interpretation and reasoning:

The Court noted that GST is levied on the "supply" of goods or services. The transit loss occurs during transportation before the supply is completed, as the goods are not yet delivered to the customer. Therefore, the transit loss does not constitute a supply under Section 7 of the CGST Act.

Key evidence and findings:

The applicant provided documentation, including delivery challans and tax invoices, showing that the loss occurs during transit and before the issuance of a tax invoice. The applicant also submitted a Chartered Accountant's certificate confirming the accounting treatment of transit losses.

Application of law to facts:

The transit loss occurs before the goods are delivered to the customer, thus falling outside the scope of "supply" as defined under the CGST Act. The Court concluded that GST is not applicable on goods lost in transit.

Treatment of competing arguments:

The applicant argued that there is no supply of goods lost in transit, supported by precedents from previous rulings. The Court agreed with this interpretation, finding no supply in the case of transit loss.

Conclusions:

The Court held that GST is not payable on goods lost in transit.

Issue (iii): If GST is not payable, whether the applicant is required to reverse the ITC in terms of section 17 (5) (h) of the CGST Act, 2017

Relevant legal framework and precedents:

Section 17 (5) (h) of the CGST Act, 2017, specifies that ITC is not available for goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off, or disposed of by way of gift or free samples.

Court's interpretation and reasoning:

The Court reasoned that since the goods are lost during transit and not supplied, the inputs used in manufacturing these goods do not contribute to a taxable outward supply. Therefore, ITC is not permissible for these inputs.

Key evidence and findings:

The applicant's accounting practices and documentation indicated that the transit loss is accounted for as a financial cost, with no separate recovery from customers.

Application of law to facts:

The inputs used in the lost goods do not meet the conditions for ITC under Section 16 of the CGST Act, as they do not contribute to a taxable supply.

Treatment of competing arguments:

The applicant argued that ITC should not be reversed as the loss is not akin to those specified under Section 17 (5) (h). However, the Court found that the conditions for ITC were not satisfied due to the absence of a taxable supply.

Conclusions:

The Court held that the applicant is required to reverse the ITC for inputs used in goods lost in transit.

SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

Preserve verbatim quotes of crucial legal reasoning:

"It is evident that there is no supply of the said goods by the applicant to its customer more so since the loss is before the goods are handed over to the customer."

Core principles established:

The judgment establishes that GST is not applicable on goods lost in transit as they do not constitute a supply under the CGST Act. Furthermore, ITC must be reversed for inputs used in goods lost in transit, as they do not contribute to a taxable supply.

Final determinations on each issue:

(i) No GST is payable on goods lost in transit.

(ii) Not applicable, as GST is not payable.

(iii) The applicant is required to reverse the ITC for inputs used in goods lost in transit.

(iv) The applicant must reverse the ITC based on the inputs used in the outward supply lost in transit, in accordance with Section 17 (5) (h) and Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017.

---