Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cash deposits made during the demonetization period in specified bank notes were liable to be treated as unexplained money under section 69A and taxed under section 115BBE of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee produced books of account, audit report, financial statements, bank statements and comparative turnover details to show that the deposits formed part of business receipts and realised sale proceeds. The reasoning accepted that the assessee was engaged in cash-intensive trading of vegetables and fruits, that the deposits were supported by the recorded cash flow and that, on the facts, the nature of the business and the pattern of receipts made the explanation plausible. Following the coordinate bench view on an identical issue, the Tribunal held that where the source of cash deposits is satisfactorily explained as business receipts, the deposits cannot be assessed as unexplained money merely because they were received in specified bank notes during the demonetization period.
Conclusion: The addition under section 69A and the consequential tax under section 115BBE were deleted, and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.