Delay of 278 Days in Filing Civil Appeal Deemed Inexcusable; Application for Condonation Rejected The SC dismissed a Civil Appeal due to a 278-day delay in filing, finding the reasons for seeking condonation neither satisfactory nor sufficient in law. ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delay of 278 Days in Filing Civil Appeal Deemed Inexcusable; Application for Condonation Rejected
The SC dismissed a Civil Appeal due to a 278-day delay in filing, finding the reasons for seeking condonation neither satisfactory nor sufficient in law. The application for condonation of delay was rejected, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal itself. The Court kept open any potential questions of law and disposed of all pending applications related to the case.
The Supreme Court, presided over by Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B. V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, addressed an appeal with a "gross delay of 278 days" in filing. The Court found that the "reasons assigned for seeking condonation of delay are neither satisfactory nor sufficient in law." Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the Civil Appeal. The Court noted that any "question of law, if any, is kept open." All pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
