Educational institution gets tax exemption after subsequent approval despite initial ITR processing adjustment under sections 12A and 10(23C)

ITAT Delhi held that despite adjustment made during ITR processing under section 143(1) due to absence of approval under sections 12A and 10(23C)(i) read with 10(23C)(vi), the assessee became entitled to exemption after subsequent approval dated 08.07.2024. Since the assessee's entire income derived from educational institution was fully exempted, no tax could be levied on exempted income. Matter was restored to AO to give effect to the exemption order and allow consequential relief. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered in this appeal include:

• Whether the denial of exemption of Rs. 77,43,697/- by the CPC, Bengaluru, under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was justified.
• Whether the assessee's claim for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, should have been considered by the AO, CPC, despite the lack of registration under section 12A at the time of filing the ITR.
• Whether the subsequent approval under section 10(23C)(i) rws 10(23C)(vi) of the Act, obtained after the processing of the ITR, affects the validity of the exemption claim for the relevant assessment year.
• Whether the AO, CPC, had the authority to entertain a new claim or change its stand during the processing of the ITR under section 143(1) of the Act.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Denial of Exemption and Relevant Legal Framework

The legal framework revolves around sections 11, 12, and 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which provide exemptions for income derived by certain entities, subject to registration requirements. The AO, CPC, denied the exemption based on the assessee's lack of registration under section 12A, which is a prerequisite for claiming benefits under sections 11 and 12.

The Tribunal considered whether the assessee's claim under section 10(23C)(iiiad), which does not require registration under section 12A, should have been entertained. The Tribunal noted that the AO, CPC, did not consider this claim during the ITR processing, leading to the enhancement of income by Rs. 77,43,697/-.

Subsequent Approval and Its Impact

The Tribunal examined the impact of the approval obtained under section 10(23C)(i) rws 10(23C)(vi) after the ITR processing. The approval, effective from AY 2022-23 to 2026-27, was argued to render the entire income of the relevant year exempt, as it was derived from an educational institution.

The Tribunal acknowledged the anomaly created by the subsequent approval, which justified the exemption claim despite the initial denial. The Tribunal emphasized that tax could not be levied on exempted income, necessitating a reevaluation of the AO's decision in light of the new approval.

Authority of AO, CPC, in Entertaining New Claims

The Tribunal assessed whether the AO, CPC, had the authority to entertain new claims or change its stand during the ITR processing under section 143(1). The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A)'s finding that the AO, CPC, lacked such authority, as the disallowance was based on the absence of a registration number in Form 10B.

The Tribunal referenced the decision in Joyo Plastics, which supported the view that the AO, CPC, was not required to pass a speaking order for adjustments made based on entries by the appellant and the Tax Auditor.

SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

The Tribunal concluded that the denial of exemption was initially justified due to the lack of registration under section 12A. However, the subsequent approval under section 10(23C)(i) rws 10(23C)(vi) necessitated a reevaluation, as it rendered the income exempt for the relevant year.

The Tribunal directed the AO to give effect to the order passed under section 10(23C)(i) rws 10(23C)(vi) and allow the benefit of section 10(23C), providing consequential relief to the assessee.

The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, highlighting the principle that tax cannot be levied on exempted income and emphasizing the importance of subsequent approvals in determining exemption eligibility.

---