1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal decision upheld, no duty leviable, appeal dismissed on penalty proceedings</h1> The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that no duty was leviable on the respondent, leading to the dismissal of the appeal regarding penalty ... Penalty- The present appeal filed under section 35-G of Central Excise Act arises out of penalty proceedings initiated against the respondent under Rule 173Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 on that ground that the respondent has furnished his incorrect particulars of the goods produced and has not paid the duty in accordance with law. Held that- no penalty under the Rule 1730 of the said Rules could be levied on the respondent.We do not find that any substantial question of law is involved in the appeal.The appeal is dismissed summarily. The appeal under section 35-G of Central Excise Act involved penalty proceedings against the respondent for incorrect particulars of goods and non-payment of duty. The Tribunal held no duty was leviable on the respondent, and the High Court dismissed the appeal, stating no penalty could be levied. No substantial question of law was found.