1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court Dismisses SLPs, Citing Precedent from Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax Case</h1> SLPs were dismissed by the SC as the primary legal issue was already addressed in Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [2024 SCC Online ... Allowability of broken period interest - HC [2018 (4) TMI 523 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] concluded issue against the Revenue - petitioner(s) submitted that the issues raised in these petitions are covered by the order of this Court in Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [2024 (10) TMI 875 - SUPREME COURT] HELD THAT:- Following the aforesaid order, these Special Leave Petitions also stand dismissed. Summary: The Special Leave Petitions were heard and the Court noted that the issues raised are 'covered by the order of this Court in Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [2024 SCC Online SC 2877].' Relying on that precedent, the petitions 'stand dismissed.' The order disposes of all pending applications. Key legal terminology: Special Leave Petitions, covered by, order, stand dismissed, pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. The ruling is a summary dismissal on the basis of existing Supreme Court precedent rather than on fresh factual or substantive adjudication.