Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cash deposits made in the assessee's bank account during the demonetisation period could be treated as unexplained income when the assessee showed earlier cash withdrawals from his own bank account and there was no finding that the withdrawn cash had been utilised elsewhere.
Analysis: The assessee established that cash had earlier been withdrawn from his bank account and that the later deposits were out of such withdrawn cash. The Department did not bring any positive material to show that the withdrawn cash was spent, invested, or otherwise unavailable with the assessee at the time of re-deposit. Mere reliance on the time gap between withdrawal and re-deposit, or on assumptions about normal human conduct, was held insufficient to displace the assessee's explanation. In the absence of contrary evidence, the addition could not be sustained as an unexplained cash credit.
Conclusion: The addition on account of cash deposits was deleted and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessee substantiates that cash deposited in the bank came from prior withdrawals and the Revenue fails to show that the withdrawn cash was utilised for any other purpose, the deposit cannot be treated as unexplained income merely because of a time gap or suspicion.