Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was liable to be treated as the agent of the non-resident company under section 43 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, on the footing that the rent payment was received through the assessee or that there was a business connection between them.
Analysis: Section 43 deems a resident to be the agent of a non-resident if the resident is employed by or on behalf of the non-resident, has a business connection with the non-resident, or is a person through whom the non-resident receives income, profits or gains. On the facts, the payment of rent was a direct payment to the non-resident and could not be treated as receipt through the assessee. The transaction was a solitary letting arrangement, and there was no real or intimate relation between any trading activity of the non-resident and activity in the taxable territories that could amount to a business connection within the meaning of the Act.
Conclusion: The assessee was not an agent of the non-resident company under section 43, and the reference was answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A direct payment to a non-resident, arising from an isolated transaction without continuity or an intimate business nexus with activities in the taxable territories, does not constitute receipt through the resident or a business connection for the purpose of section 43 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.