Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the intimation of tax issued under Section 73(5) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was premature and not maintainable at that stage.
Analysis: The intimation under Section 73(5) was only an ascertainment of tax, coupled with liberty to pay the amount with interest or submit objections. No show cause notice under Section 73(1) had been issued and no adjudication order under Section 73(9) had been passed. The challenge was therefore directed against a stage preceding the statutory adjudicatory process.
Conclusion: The writ petition was premature and could not be entertained at that stage; the challenge failed.