Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax was leviable on liquidated damages collected by the assessee from contractors and suppliers under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994, and whether the demand and impugned appellate order were sustainable.
Analysis: The issue was treated as already settled by prior Tribunal decisions and supported by the Board's circulars. The Tribunal noted that liquidated damages or penalty/late delivery charges do not constitute a declared service under Section 66E(e), and therefore cannot be subjected to service tax.
Conclusion: The demand of service tax on liquidated damages was not sustainable and the impugned order was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee obtained relief by deletion of the service tax demand on liquidated damages.
Ratio Decidendi: Liquidated damages collected for breach or delay do not amount to a declared service and are not liable to service tax under Section 66E(e) of the Finance Act, 1994.