Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 could continue beyond one year and remain enforceable against the petitioner.
Analysis: The attachment was made under Section 83 of the Act, which provides that a provisional attachment ordinarily ceases to have effect after one year from the date of the order. The Court did not enter upon the separate controversy relating to enforcement of demand after the appeal proceedings, and instead confined itself to the statutory duration of the attachment. On the admitted chronology, the attachment order dated 13 April 2023 had crossed the one-year period and had, therefore, ceased to operate by efflux of time.
Conclusion: The provisional attachment could not be continued or enforced against the petitioner at that stage. The writ petition succeeded to that extent.