Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denial of input tax credit on the ground of limitation could be sustained after the insertion of Section 16(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 with retrospective effect, and whether the consequential impugned order could stand.
Analysis: The claim of input tax credit was earlier treated as time-barred under Section 16(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The subsequent statutory amendment inserted Section 16(5), which entitled registered persons to take input tax credit in respect of invoices or debit notes pertaining to the specified financial years where the return under Section 39 was filed up to 30.11.2021. In light of the retrospective effect given to the amendment from 01.07.2017 and the connected notification and circular, the limitation-based denial of input tax credit could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed insofar as it rejected the input tax credit claim on limitation grounds, and the Department was restrained from proceeding further on that basis. Consequential directions were also issued for de-freezing the bank account, dropping recovery action, and refund or adjustment of amounts already collected.