Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Customs Officers' Jurisdiction Upheld in DEPB Credit Case</h1> <h3>SRAVANI IMPEX P. LTD. Versus ADDL. DIR. GENERAL, DRI., CHENNAT</h3> SRAVANI IMPEX P. LTD. Versus ADDL. DIR. GENERAL, DRI., CHENNAT - 2010 (252) E.L.T. 19 (A. P.) Issues Involved:1. Jurisdiction of Customs Officers to issue show cause notices.2. Validity of DEPB credit claims.3. Allegations of fraudulent over-invoicing and illegal foreign exchange remittances.4. Confiscation of goods and penalties under the Customs Act.5. Role of DGFT vs. Customs authorities in DEPB scheme enforcement.Detailed Analysis:1. Jurisdiction of Customs Officers to Issue Show Cause Notices:The court examined whether the Customs officers had the authority to issue show cause notices regarding DEPB credits and related penalties. The petitioner argued that only the DGFT had jurisdiction over DEPB credits, citing Circular No. 15/97 and various case laws, including Union of India v. Asian Foods and Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai v. Vishal Exports Overseas Ltd. However, the court noted that DEPB credits are akin to customs duty exemptions and that Customs officers have the power to investigate and demand repayment of fraudulently obtained credits under Section 28(1) of the Customs Act.2. Validity of DEPB Credit Claims:The petitioner claimed DEPB credits based on export incentives. The court highlighted that the DEPB scheme required exporters to file shipping bills and obtain Bank Realization Certificates (BRCs) as proof of export proceeds. The Customs officers' role included verifying the correctness of declarations in shipping bills. The court found that fraudulent over-invoicing and false declarations in shipping bills justified the Customs officers' actions to demand repayment and impose penalties.3. Allegations of Fraudulent Over-Invoicing and Illegal Foreign Exchange Remittances:The show cause notices alleged that the petitioner inflated export values to fraudulently claim DEPB credits and used illicit channels to remit foreign exchange. The court emphasized that fraudulent activities, such as over-invoicing and illegal remittances, violated the conditions of the DEPB scheme and justified the issuance of show cause notices by Customs officers.4. Confiscation of Goods and Penalties under the Customs Act:The court examined the provisions of the Customs Act, including Sections 113, 114, and 111(d), which deal with the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties for improper exportation. It held that goods entered for exportation with false declarations are liable for confiscation, and personal penalties can be imposed on those responsible. The court cited various judgments, including Om Prakash Bhatia v. Commissioner of Customs, Delhi, to support its findings.5. Role of DGFT vs. Customs Authorities in DEPB Scheme Enforcement:The court clarified that while the DGFT issues DEPB licenses, Customs authorities have the power to verify declarations and demand repayment of fraudulently obtained credits. The court noted that the DGFT's role is limited to issuing and canceling licenses, whereas Customs authorities are responsible for ensuring compliance with customs laws and regulations. The court distinguished the present case from others cited by the petitioner, where there were no allegations of fraud.Conclusion:The court dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the Customs officers had jurisdiction to issue the show cause notices and demand repayment of DEPB credits obtained through fraudulent means. The court emphasized that the petitioner must respond to the show cause notices and that the observations made in the judgment were limited to the legal premise of jurisdiction. The petitioner's request for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court was also rejected.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found