Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to concessional rate of tax at 2% on an admitted inter-State sale transaction despite non-issuance of Form-C declaration and the inability of the High Court to issue a direct command to the jurisdictional assessing officer outside its territorial jurisdiction.
Analysis: The transaction with the purchasing dealer was admitted by the revenue to be an inter-State sale. The denial of Form-C arose because the purchasing dealer had not applied for issuance of Form-C before its jurisdictional assessing officer, and the assessee was not at fault for that omission. The Court treated Form-C as a facilitative document for availing concessional tax and noted that where the underlying sale is otherwise established, the benefit cannot be denied merely because the declaration was not issued for reasons not attributable to the selling dealer. Exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the Court relied on the admitted facts, contemporaneous departmental communication, and the need to do substantial justice.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to concessional rate of tax at 2% on the subject transaction, and the revenue was directed to act accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an inter-State sale is admitted and the selling dealer is not responsible for the failure to obtain Form-C, the concessional rate of tax cannot be denied merely on that procedural lapse if the transaction is otherwise established by admitted materials.