Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the GST assessment order could be set aside for want of effective opportunity and whether the matter should be reopened for fresh adjudication on payment of 10% of the disputed tax.
Analysis: The petitioner alleged that the notices and assessment order were not properly served and that no effective opportunity was granted before confirmation of the proposal. The dispute arose from alleged incorrect availment of input tax credit, rate difference, e-way bill mismatch, non-filing of GSTR-9C, and interest on belated return filing. In the circumstances, and by consent, the Court granted an opportunity to contest the proposal afresh, while making the relief conditional on deposit of 10% of the disputed tax and treating the impugned assessment as a show cause notice upon compliance.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside and the matter was reopened for fresh consideration subject to deposit of 10% of the disputed tax and filing of objections within the stipulated time.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained a conditional reopening of the assessment proceedings, while the impugned order would revive if the stipulated deposit or objection-filing requirements were not complied with.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an assessment is challenged on the ground of ineffective notice and denial of meaningful opportunity, the Court may set aside the order and permit fresh adjudication subject to protective conditions such as partial deposit and timely filing of objections.