Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of approval under section 80G(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for selecting the wrong clause in Form 10AB should be sustained when the mistake was inadvertent and the assessee had earlier 80G approval.
Analysis: The assessee had already been enjoying 80G approval and had also obtained provisional registration under the new regime. The only defect found in the application was that the wrong clause was selected in Form 10AB after the provisional period had expired. The mistake was held to be inadvertent, typographical and bona fide, and the rejection on that technical ground was found unsustainable. The reasoning was supported by coordinate bench decisions recognising correction of such technical errors and by the principle of substantial compliance, particularly where the lapse is procedural rather than substantive. The matter was therefore required to be reconsidered on merits after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to present supporting material.
Conclusion: The rejection of the application could not be upheld merely for the technical error, and the matter was restored to the tax authority for fresh adjudication after treating the application as one filed under the correct clause and after granting reasonable opportunity to the assessee.