TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Writ challenging detention of truck dismissed; payment of penalty under s.129(1) in s.129(3) proceedings concludes matter under s.129(5)</h1> HC dismissed the writ challenging detention of a truck and sought order in Form GST MOV-09. The court held that under s.129(5), once the penalty ... Illegal detention of a truck carrying a consignment - Seeking passing of order in Form GST MOV-09 - HELD THAT:- Sub-section (5) under section 129 says, on payment of amount referred in sub-section (1), all proceeding in respect of the notice specified in sub-section (3) shall be deemed to be concluded. Proceeding under sub-section (3) was initiated by the notice, received by petitioner. This happened on detaining his truck. There was calculation of penalty to be paid. It was in the proceeding commenced by the notice. Petitioner paid the penalty. Sub-section (5) came into operation. It is not necessary to adjudicate on whether in spite of payment of the required penalty an order was required to be made under sub-section (3) because on the payment, by operation of sub-section (5), the proceeding was deemed to be concluded. There are no merit in the writ petition. It is dismissed. The Orissa High Court considered a case involving a petition seeking an order under Form GST MOV-09 due to the illegal detention of a truck carrying a consignment. The petitioner paid a penalty on the same day as the detention, leading to the release of the truck. The court found that the payment of the penalty concluded the proceedings as per Section 129(5) of the Odisha Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, and therefore dismissed the writ petition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
