Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the addition made on account of provision released was sustainable. (ii) Whether the ad hoc disallowance of 5% of other expenditure was sustainable.
Issue (i): Whether the addition made on account of provision released was sustainable.
Analysis: The assessee had created the relevant provision in the earlier assessment year and had not claimed it as a deduction in that year. In the year under appeal, only a part of that provision was released and credited to the profit and loss account by reducing the carried-forward provision shown in the balance sheet. On these facts, the release did not represent a fresh taxable inflow warranting addition as income.
Conclusion: The addition on account of provision released was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the ad hoc disallowance of 5% of other expenditure was sustainable.
Analysis: The expenditure related to multiple routine administrative heads and the assessee furnished ledger extracts and sample vouchers. The books were audited, and no specific defect or infirmity was identified by the lower authorities to justify a blanket percentage disallowance.
Conclusion: The ad hoc disallowance of 5% of other expenditure was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded in full and the additions made by the lower authorities were deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: A release of a provision created in an earlier year, when not earlier claimed as a deduction, cannot be taxed as income merely because it is credited in the year of reversal, and an ad hoc disallowance of expenditure cannot be sustained without identifying specific defects in the accounts or supporting evidence.