Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the assessments for the period 1-4-1994 to 31-3-1995 were provisional; and (ii) whether the refund claim was barred by limitation.
Issue (i): whether the assessments for the period 1-4-1994 to 31-3-1995 were provisional.
Analysis: The record showed endorsements by the Range Superintendent on the assessment memoranda indicating that the assessments were provisional. The Tribunal also noted that the same assessee's earlier case had already been held to involve provisional assessments, and that the department could not ignore the contemporaneous endorsements merely because no further formality such as execution of bond was relied upon.
Conclusion: The assessments for the relevant period were provisional, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): whether the refund claim was barred by limitation.
Analysis: Once the assessments were found to be provisional, the refund arose on finalisation of those assessments. In that situation, the claim could not be treated as time barred under the refund limitation provision applicable to final assessments. The refund claim was therefore maintainable.
Conclusion: The refund claim was not barred by limitation and was admissible, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the refund claim was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where assessments are shown to have remained provisional, refund on finalisation cannot be rejected as time barred under the limitation applicable to final assessments.