Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Customs Department could continue coercive measures, including freezing of bank accounts, during investigation while deferring adjudication, and what interim directions were warranted regarding the investigation and the petitioner's bank accounts.
Analysis: The petitioner challenged provisional attachment of its bank account in connection with an investigation into exemption claimed under Notification No. 50/2017-Customs. The Court noted that repeated coercive action during investigation, without prompt commencement of adjudication by issuance of a show cause notice, would cause undue hardship and disrupt business operations. It further observed that freezing of bank accounts can severely affect trade and overdraft-based working arrangements. The Court therefore directed the Department to complete the investigation and issue a show cause notice within three months, and permitted immediate defreezing of the HSBC accounts to enable an ad hoc deposit.
Conclusion: The challenge succeeded in part. The Department was required to proceed expeditiously with adjudication, the bank accounts were to be defrozen, and the petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 3 crores under protest.