Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to withdraw Rs. 60,00,000 from the amount deposited in Court, with the balance to be returned to the Bank of Maharashtra, and whether such withdrawal would preserve the petitioner's right to pursue other remedies.
Analysis: The Court recorded that the gold ornaments to be restored to the petitioner were valued at approximately Rs. 59,50,000 and accepted the rounded figure of Rs. 60,00,000 for release out of the deposited sum of Rs. 70,00,000. It also noted that the remaining articles in the strong room were found safe and tallied on joint verification, and that the deposit was made by the bank for administrative convenience. The Court further recorded that the payment and return of balance were to operate without prejudice to the inter-se rights and liabilities of the bank and the Income Tax Department, and without affecting the petitioner's ordinary remedies.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to withdraw Rs. 60,00,000 from the amount deposited in Court, the balance Rs. 10,00,000 was directed to be returned to the Bank of Maharashtra, and the petitioner's right to pursue other remedies was preserved.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the material entitlement is admitted and the parties' remaining dispute is preserved without prejudice, the Court may direct release of a reasonable amount from a deposited sum while safeguarding inter-se rights and other available remedies.