TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Bank of Maharashtra and Tax Department Resolve Gold Ornaments Dispute; Court Allows Withdrawal of Funds</h1> <h3>Hiralal H. Malu, Legal Heir of The Late Mrs. Shakuntala Hiralal Malu Versus The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) Unit 1 (1), Pune & ors.</h3> Hiralal H. Malu, Legal Heir of The Late Mrs. Shakuntala Hiralal Malu Versus The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation) Unit 1 (1), Pune & ors. - ... The High Court of Bombay recently issued a judgment in a case involving the Bank of Maharashtra and the Income Tax Department, with the Petitioner seeking the return of gold ornaments. The core legal questions considered in this judgment include the appropriate amount to be paid to the Petitioner, the liability of the Bank of Maharashtra, and the actions to be taken to prevent similar incidents in the future.The Court heard arguments from both parties and noted that an amount of Rs. 70,00,000 had been deposited in the Court, with discrepancies in the valuation of the gold ornaments. The Bank of Maharashtra submitted an affidavit confirming the safety of other items in the strong room and expressing willingness to pay compensation to the Petitioner as directed by the Court.The Court appreciated the reasonable approach taken by the Bank and the Income Tax Department in resolving the matter and ensuring no injustice to the Petitioner. Consequently, the Court granted the Petitioner liberty to withdraw Rs. 60,00,000 from the deposited amount, with the remaining Rs. 10,00,000 to be returned to the Bank of Maharashtra. The Petitioner was allowed to pursue further remedies if necessary.In conclusion, the Court disposed of the petition without costs and emphasized the importance of the authorities addressing the incident to prevent future occurrences and ensure citizens' entitlements are secured without resorting to legal action. The judgment serves as a reminder for all parties involved to act upon the Court's order for the resolution of the matter and the prevention of similar incidents.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
