TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Income Tax assessment order quashed for failure to serve proper notice under Section 169</h1> <h3>M/s. P.N. Traders, Represented by its Proprietor, A. Wiselam. Versus The Deputy State Tax Officer -2, Nagercoil</h3> M/s. P.N. Traders, Represented by its Proprietor, A. Wiselam. Versus The Deputy State Tax Officer -2, Nagercoil - TMI The issues presented and considered in the Madras High Court judgment are as follows:1. Whether the petitioner was served with a notice in compliance with Section 169 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (TNGST Act)Rs. 2. Whether the assessment order passed by the respondent dated 26.04.2024 for the assessment year 2018-19 is validRs.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. The relevant legal framework is Section 169 of the TNGST Act, which specifies the methods of serving notices, including in person, by registered post, e-mail, or publication in a newspaper. The Court interpreted Section 169 as mandating strict compliance with the prescribed modes of service to ensure natural justice. The key evidence was the contention raised by the petitioner that they were not served with a notice as required by law. The Court considered the judgment in a batch of writ petitions, emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed modes of service. The Court concluded that the petitioner was not served with a notice in compliance with Section 169, leading to the quashing of the assessment order.2. The Court analyzed the assessment order in light of the petitioner's argument regarding non-compliance with the notice requirements. The Court referred to the previous judgment to establish the legal principles governing service of notices under the TNGST Act. The Court found that the assessment order was not sustainable due to the failure to serve a notice in accordance with Section 169. The Court set aside the impugned assessment order and directed the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice, followed by a hearing and appropriate orders by the respondent.Significant Holdings:The Court held that strict compliance with the principles of natural justice, as outlined in Section 169 of the TNGST Act, is essential for serving notices. The Court emphasized that the rules cannot circumvent the statutory provisions regarding the modes of service. The judgment established that failure to serve a notice in compliance with the prescribed methods renders the assessment order invalid. The Court quashed the assessment order and directed the petitioner to respond to the show cause notice for further proceedings.In conclusion, the Madras High Court judgment focused on the importance of adhering to the statutory requirements for serving notices under the TNGST Act. The Court's decision to quash the assessment order highlights the significance of procedural compliance in tax assessments, ensuring fairness and adherence to legal principles.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
