Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to interim protection against coercive steps pursuant to the impugned order, pending consideration of the challenge to the notice, summary order and demand order under the GST regime.
Analysis: The petitioner's challenge was founded on the assertion that the impugned proceedings were taken pursuant to a notification extending the time for passing orders under section 73 of the GST law, and that the notification had already been set aside in earlier proceedings. The Court took note of the submissions and the related order relied upon for interim relief. At this stage, the matter was not finally adjudicated on merits.
Conclusion: Ad-interim protection was granted by directing that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned order till the returnable date.