Supply of permanently installed fitted assets is leasing under serial no. 17(viii) Notification No.11/2017; attracts 18% GST
AAR, WB held the applicant's supply of fitted assets on hire constitutes leasing/rental services under serial no. 17(viii) of Notification No. 11/2017 - SAC 997314 - and, as mixed supply, attracts GST at 18%. The authority found the applicant's scope limited to tap-off points, not responsible for input power quality, and that permanently installed machinery lost character as movable goods; accordingly the supplies are taxable as leasing/rental at 18%.
ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDEREDThe core legal issue considered in this judgment is the appropriate classification of services provided by the applicant, TCG Urban Infrastructure Holdings Private Limited, in terms of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate applicable to the hiring of fitted assets. The specific questions addressed are:
- Whether the services fall under serial no 17 (iii) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), attracting a GST rate of 28%.
- Whether the services should be classified under serial no 17 (viii) of the same notification, attracting a GST rate of 18%.
- Whether the services can be classified under SAC 998599 as 'Support Service', attracting a GST rate of 18%.
- Any other classification deemed appropriate by the authority.
ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS
1. Classification under Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate)
Relevant legal framework and precedents: The classification of services under the GST regime is guided by Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), which outlines specific service codes (SAC) and corresponding tax rates. The applicant initially classified the services under SAC 997314, attracting a 28% GST rate, based on the premise that the services constituted a mixed supply.
Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Court examined whether the services provided could be classified as a composite or mixed supply. It was determined that the services did not meet the criteria for a composite supply, as there was no predominant element or principal supply. Instead, the services were deemed a mixed supply, consisting of multiple independent supplies provided for a single price.
Key evidence and findings: The applicant provided assets such as electrical equipment, sprinkler systems, air conditioning systems, and DG sets. These assets were installed in both common areas and sub-leased spaces within the Bengal Intelligent Park. The Court found that these installations had lost their character as movable property, thus not qualifying as goods.
Application of law to facts: The Court applied Section 8(b) of the CGST Act, which states that a mixed supply should be taxed at the rate applicable to the supply with the highest tax rate. Since the air-conditioning system attracted the highest GST rate of 28%, the applicant initially applied this rate to the entire supply.
Treatment of competing arguments: The applicant argued for a reclassification under SAC 998599, contending that the services constituted comprehensive support services rather than leasing or renting. The Court considered this argument but ultimately found that the services aligned more closely with leasing or rental services.
Conclusions: The Court concluded that the services provided by the applicant should be classified under serial no 17 (viii) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), attracting an 18% GST rate as leasing or rental services.
2. Classification as Support Services under SAC 998599
Relevant legal framework and precedents: The applicant sought classification under SAC 998599, which pertains to 'Other support services not elsewhere classified'. The applicant drew parallels to a recent circular on data hosting services, arguing for a comprehensive service classification.
Court's interpretation and reasoning: The Court examined the explanatory notes for SAC 998599 and found that the description of services did not align with the services provided by the applicant. The Court noted that the applicant's services were more akin to leasing or renting, given the nature of the assets and their use.
Key evidence and findings: The applicant provided infrastructure elements essential for the building's operation, such as air-conditioning systems and fire sprinkler systems. However, these were not standalone services but part of the leasing arrangement.
Application of law to facts: The Court determined that the applicant's services did not fit within the scope of SAC 998599, as they were not business support services or infrastructural support services as defined in the explanatory notes.
Treatment of competing arguments: The applicant's argument for classification under SAC 998599 was considered but ultimately rejected. The Court found that the services were more accurately described as leasing or rental services.
Conclusions: The Court concluded that the applicant's services could not be classified under SAC 998599 and should instead be classified as leasing or rental services under serial no 17 (viii) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate).
SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS
Core principles established: The judgment reinforced the principle that the classification of services under GST should be based on the nature of the supply and the applicable legal framework. The distinction between composite and mixed supplies was crucial in determining the appropriate tax rate.
Final determinations on each issue: The Court ruled that the services provided by the applicant fall under serial no 17 (viii) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) as leasing or rental services, attracting an 18% GST rate. The Court rejected the classification under SAC 998599 as support services.
Preserve verbatim quotes of crucial legal reasoning: "In the instant case, the supply of services as provided by the applicant would be regarded as leasing or rental services and each of the supplies would attract tax @ 18% under serial number 17 (viii) of the Notification No. 11/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended, as leasing or rental services and therefore, supplies provided by the applicant, being a mixed supply, would also be taxable @ 18% i.e., supply which attracts the highest rate of tax."
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
