Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed: SC of India Condones Delay but Finds No Substantial Grounds to Interfere with Judgment</h1> The SC of India dismissed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing but finding no substantial grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment. The ... Levy of service tax - business support service - reimbursements received by the appellants from their group companies for expenses incurred on their behalf - reimbursements can be considered as 'consideration' for the purpose of levying service tax as per the Explanation to Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 or not - it was held by CESTAT that the reimbursement of expenses incurred by one entity on behalf of another, without the provision of a service, does not constitute a taxable service. Such reimbursements do not qualify as 'consideration' for service tax purposes. HELD THAT:- There are no good ground and reason to interfere with the impugned judgment; hence, the present appeal is dismissed. The Supreme Court of India, presided over by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar, addressed an appeal where the petitioner was represented by Mr. N. Venkataraman, A.S.G., and other legal counsel. The respondent did not appear. The Court condoned the delay in filing but found no substantial grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of.