TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Dismissed: SC of India Condones Delay but Finds No Substantial Grounds to Interfere with Judgment</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, NAVI MUMBAI Versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD.</h3> The SC of India dismissed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing but finding no substantial grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment. The ... Levy of service tax - business support service - reimbursements received by the appellants from their group companies for expenses incurred on their behalf - reimbursements can be considered as 'consideration' for the purpose of levying service tax as per the Explanation to Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994 or not - it was held by CESTAT that the reimbursement of expenses incurred by one entity on behalf of another, without the provision of a service, does not constitute a taxable service. Such reimbursements do not qualify as 'consideration' for service tax purposes. HELD THAT:- There are no good ground and reason to interfere with the impugned judgment; hence, the present appeal is dismissed. The Supreme Court of India, presided over by Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar, addressed an appeal where the petitioner was represented by Mr. N. Venkataraman, A.S.G., and other legal counsel. The respondent did not appear. The Court condoned the delay in filing but found no substantial grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
