Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund was admissible where tax had been paid twice on the same advance receipt under the service tax regime and again under the GST regime.
Analysis: The liability on advance receipts arose under the pre-GST service tax framework, while the same transaction was again subjected to tax after the GST regime commenced. The transition between the two regimes was treated as a continuous fiscal process, with transitional credit and saving provisions preserving continuity of tax adjustment. On the facts, the same tax incidence had been suffered twice for the same transaction, and such double taxation could not be sustained. In those circumstances, the proper course was to grant refund in cash in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held to be maintainable and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed with a direction to consider and grant the refund in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the same transaction is subjected to tax under two successive regimes, and the tax incidence is shown to have been discharged twice, refund cannot be denied merely because the first payment was otherwise made under the earlier regime.