Higher authority finds Additional Director General, DRI lacked jurisdiction to issue show cause on declared value and confiscation SC held that CESTAT had found the Additional Director General, DRI, lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice challenging declared value and ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Higher authority finds Additional Director General, DRI lacked jurisdiction to issue show cause on declared value and confiscation
SC held that CESTAT had found the Additional Director General, DRI, lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice challenging declared value and confiscation. The Supreme Court remitted the matter to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata, for adjudication consistent with that view and disposed of the appeal.
The Supreme Court of India, with Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan presiding, issued an order concerning civil appeals. The Court condoned the delay and granted an application seeking exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned judgment. Citing the precedent set in "Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd" (2024) SCC Online SC 3188, the Court remitted the proceedings back to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata. Consequently, the civil appeals and any pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
