TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Higher authority finds Additional Director General, DRI lacked jurisdiction to issue show cause on declared value and confiscation</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Customs (Port) Versus M/s. Tata Steel Limited.</h3> SC held that CESTAT had found the Additional Director General, DRI, lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice challenging declared value and ... Jurisdiction - power of Additional Director General, DRI to issue SCN - Confiscation of goods - rejection of declared value - it was held by CESTAT that 'the Additional Director General, DRI did not have the jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice.' HELD THAT:- The proceedings are now remitted back to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata. Appeal disposed off. The Supreme Court of India, with Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan presiding, issued an order concerning civil appeals. The Court condoned the delay and granted an application seeking exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned judgment. Citing the precedent set in 'Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd' (2024) SCC Online SC 3188, the Court remitted the proceedings back to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, East Regional Bench, Kolkata. Consequently, the civil appeals and any pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
