1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions Citing No Grounds Under Order XLVII Rule 1 of SC Rules 2013.</h1> The SC, with Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Sandeep Mehta presiding, dismissed the review petitions. The court found no error apparent on the ... Rectification of mistake - error apparent on the face of the record or not - Imposition of penalty on the Appellant under Section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - cryptic and non-speaking order - HELD THAT:- There is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 has been established. The Review Petitions are therefore, dismissed. Supreme Court Judgment Summary:In the case reviewed by the Supreme Court, Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Sandeep Mehta presided. The court examined the review petitions and determined that there was 'no error apparent on the face of the record.' Consequently, the court found that no grounds for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 were established. As a result, the Review Petitions were dismissed.