Review jurisdiction requires an error apparent on the face of the record before relief can be granted.

Review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 is confined to cases where a patent and manifest error is shown on the face of the record. The stated threshold requires more than disagreement with the earlier decision; an error must be apparent from the record itself. On perusal of the review petitions, no such error was found and no ground satisfying the review standard was established, so the petitions did not meet the requirements for review.

---

---

Issues: Whether the review petitions disclosed any error apparent on the face of the record so as to warrant review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013.

Analysis: The review jurisdiction is confined to cases where a patent and manifest error is shown on the face of the record. On perusal of the review petitions, no such error was found and no ground satisfying the threshold for review was established.

Conclusion: The review petitions did not meet the requirements for review and were liable to be dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: Review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 lies only when an error apparent on the face of the record is demonstrated.

---